Dormant pruning is a vital orchard task for maintaining crop-load quality and quantity, but it takes years to gain expertise. Given prolonged training periods and agricultural labor shortages, there is an increased interest in automating this decision process.
Beyond mechanical design and computer vision, a major challenge in automated pruning is determining where to make pruning cuts.
These decisions depend on complex, plant- and cultivar-specific factors, including tree and branch characteristics, growth history, tree architecture, environmental conditions, and production goals.
But how expert pruners map these factors remains largely unknown, as pruning decisions are often based on intuition and experience. Successful automation will require translating these implicit decision-making processes into explicit, algorithmic rules.
To capture these decisions, we conducted over four hours of in-field interviews and observed pruning at sites in Prosser, WA, across:
Being in the field allowed us to ground participants’ decisions in real-world tree morphology.
From pruning observations, we also created a manually annotated dataset of 661 pruning cuts across the three tree cultivars (124 UFO, Bing Cherries; 229 V-Trellis, Envy Apples; 308 V-Trellis, Jazz Apples).
For each identified cut, we labeled the low-level features, such as branch length, branch vector, and number of buds, along with the corresponding cut decisions (e.g., cut placement and angle).
Afterward, we grouped cultivar cuts that exhibited the same cut decision into one of three horticultural goals: environmental management, crop-load management, and replacement wood.
These goals represent whole-tree- or orchard-level influences that affect cut decisions and were identified through the in-field interviews.
An example decision grouping and horticultural goal for UFO, Bing Cherries can be found in Figure 1.
All instances of cuts labeled as longer than 6 inches (15.24 cm) and with a branch direction of into the interior (of the architecture) or out of the row were mapped to the cut decision to prune at the branch’s base, with an angle parallel to the main branch (see Figure 1 right, red lines).
This decision related to the horticultural goal of environmental management, which encompasses pruning decisions that alter the local environment, such as removing or pruning branches to optimize light distribution, increase air circulation, and prevent the spread of fungal or bacterial growth.
Figure 1. (Left) Mapping of low-level UFO Bing Cherries features to cut decisions with the corresponding horticultural goal. (Right) Two example cuts based on this mapping, marked by red lines.
We uncovered 6 additional mappings of horticultural guidelines to cuts, that were validated through interviews with horticulturists.
For the full set, see our paper (Flynn et al., 2026).
While these decision mappings provide a foundation for autonomous pruning, they are not exhaustive, and future work should expand our decision-capture framework through cultivar-specific studies and more diverse orchard conditions to capture additional decision-making strategies and edge cases.
Deanna Flynn e Cristina Wilson
Oregon State University
Source: Fruit Matters, WSU
Image source: Sdguanlv - Growing Fruit
10 Jul 2024
Lorena Pinto pointed out that several trials are being conducted in Chile with Sweet Saretta and Sweet Stephany, 'and the calibre we have seen is above 30 and even 32. Moreover, they are self-fertile, so we have solved the pollination problem'.
11 Apr 2025
From snowy Montana comes the new “FE” cherry, cold-hardy to -45°C and ideal for pies, wine, preserves, and fresh eating. Backed by 60 years of family-driven selection, it’s now available from HoneyberryUSA, a leader in American cold-hardy fruit farming.
14 Jul 2026
A study assesses walnut and hazelnut water pollen extracts as natural alternatives to IBA in the micropropagation of CAB-6P and Gisela 6 cherry rootstocks, highlighting effects on rooting, shoot growth, chlorophyll, carbohydrates and in vitro plant quality and vigor.
14 Jul 2026
A field study in Prosser, Washington, examines how horticulturists, growers and pruners choose where to cut cherry and apple trees, turning expert intuition into explicit rules for automated dormant pruning, crop-load management and more consistent orchard decisions.
