The BeeSAM2 model uses artificial intelligence to accelerate pollinator monitoring in sweet cherry

29 Jul 2026
260

Pollination is essential for sweet cherry productivity, particularly in self-sterile cultivars that rely on insect-mediated pollen transfer to achieve optimal fruit set.

Accurately understanding the frequency and quality of pollinator visits is therefore crucial, not only for improving orchard productivity but also for clarifying physiological phenomena that remain poorly understood, such as June drop.

However, directly monitoring pollinating insect activity generally requires an enormous amount of time and manual effort.

A recent study proposes an innovative artificial intelligence-based solution: researchers have developed BeeSAM2, an automated system capable of detecting bees in time-lapse images of sweet cherry flowers with an exceptionally high level of accuracy, opening new opportunities for research and pollinator monitoring in fruit production.

Testing in protected orchards

The study was conducted in protected sweet cherry orchards at the James Hutton Institute (United Kingdom), where time-lapse cameras captured flower images at one-second intervals during periods of peak bee foraging activity.

Manual analysis of the recordings required approximately 500 hours of work, highlighting the need for automated tools.

BeeSAM2 combines two advanced artificial intelligence models: Grounding DINO, a zero-shot object detector capable of identifying objects without task-specific training, and Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2), designed to segment and automatically track objects throughout a video sequence.

The approach first employs Grounding DINO to detect bees in the images and then uses SAM2 to track their movement across the entire sequence, overcoming many of the limitations associated with conventional object recognition systems.

Accuracy of the integrated models

The optimal combination of the two models achieved a recall of 0.959 and an adjusted precision of 0.991, demonstrating that the system can identify nearly all bee visits while minimizing false detections.

These results substantially outperform the individual models used separately. Grounding DINO provides good precision but tends to miss numerous pollination events, whereas SAM2 detects a greater number of visits but may occasionally continue tracking incorrectly identified objects.

By integrating the two models, BeeSAM2 effectively exploits the strengths of both technologies.

An important advantage of this approach is its strong generalizability. Unlike many neural network-based computer vision systems, BeeSAM2 does not require extensive training using manually annotated datasets.

Adaptation to new scenarios

The researchers also evaluated the model on an independent dataset from a previous study involving different flowering plant species and honeybees (Apis mellifera), still achieving recall and precision values above 0.80.

Although these performances were slightly lower than those obtained with the original dataset, they confirmed the system’s ability to adapt to new scenarios with only minimal intervention.

The main limitations arise when bees are completely or partially concealed within the flower or when the system continues tracking plant structures that were mistakenly identified during the initial stages of processing.

Furthermore, BeeSAM2 does not distinguish among different pollinator species but simply detects their presence.

Prospects for fruit production

Nevertheless, the system can be readily integrated with species-specific classification algorithms.

Thanks to its high accuracy, BeeSAM2 represents a promising tool for automating the monitoring of flower–pollinator interactions, dramatically reducing image analysis time while providing valuable quantitative data to investigate pollination efficiency, evaluate pollinator management strategies, and improve our understanding of the relationships among foraging activity, fruit set, and yield stability in sweet cherry and many other fruit crops.

Source: Devlin, J., MacFarlane, F., Karley, A., Manfredini, F., & Williams, D. (2026). Detecting bees in cherry flowers using timelapse images and foundational models. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 41, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.26786/1920-7603(2026)897 

Image source: Stefano Lugli

Andrea Giovannini
PhD in Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science and Technology - Arboriculture and Fruitculture, University of Bologna, IT


Cherry Times – All rights reserved

What to read next

Meda™ cherries: early premium varieties expanding from Europe to China

Varieties

14 May 2025

The Meda™ cherry breeding program celebrates 15 years of innovation, showing outstanding results in Europe and Chile. With Kordia-level quality and earlier harvest, these premium varieties target top-tier markets, including China, with growing export potential.

Biodiversity in Chilean orchards boosts yield and fruit quality

Tech management

26 Feb 2026

In Chile, integrating biodiversity and natural habitats into apple and cherry orchards increases fruit set, size and long-term stability. Research by PUCV shows that native vegetation and wild pollinators improve yield and quality without expanding cultivated land.

In evidenza

Solar drying to preserve cherries out of season

Post-harvest​

18 Aug 2026

A study on 0900 Ziraat cherries evaluates indirect solar drying under different ventilation settings. Using one fan shortens drying time, preserves good color quality and provides the best technological balance between energy consumption, efficiency and sustainability.

The mechanical harvesting of Polish cherries is in full swing, though not without its concerns

Tech management

18 Aug 2026

Mechanical harvesting of sour cherries is seeing very strong demand, driven by labor shortages. Stable service rates, fully booked schedules, storms, high temperatures and fears of an early halt to fruit purchases by processors are shaping the final stage of the season.

Tag Popolari