To cover (with multifunctional nets) or not to cover? The answer lies in the type of plantation

18 Jul 2023
1728

Multifunctional covers are becoming increasingly popular for sweet cherry production. Indeed, they exert several functions, with the goal of reducing the stresses to which plants are subjected during the vegetative season. Protection against phytophagous pests (such as Drosophila suzukii) is undoubtedly one of the main benefits, allowing a significant reduction in chemical interventions.

However, the protective effect against adverse weather conditions, such as strong wind and hail, should not be overlooked. At the same time, however, these covers induce changes at the microclimatic level, affecting the quality of light, temperature, and humidity in comparison to the external environment.

In this article, we present the results of a study conducted at the University of Bologna, which aimed to evaluate the reaction of plants grafted on rootstocks of different vigor to single-row “Keep-in-touch®” cover. In this study were used plants cv. Black Star grafted on Gisela 6 (less vigorous) and CAB6P (more vigorous), trained at transverse V shape with planting density of 4.5 m x 0.9 m (2470 plants/ha).

The cover led to stem water potentials with less negative values in Gisela 6, while no effect was shown on foliar water potentials. The cover, as expected, changed the light pattern, reducing the available light radiation by a quarter in Gisela 6 and by half in CAB6P. Plants grafted onto Gisela 6, which were subjected to a more moderate radiation decrease, showed no difference in the photosynthetic performance.

In contrast, plants grafted on CAB6P, translated the light reduction into a significant decrease in photosynthetic, transpiration and stomatal conductance rates. In terms of seasonal fruit growth, plants on Gisela 6 rootstock showed no difference between net and control, while for CAB6P the use of net caused significantly lower fruit development throughout the season.

This therefore negatively affected fruit quality at harvest in plants grafted on CAB6P both in terms of size and sugar content.

On the other hand, plants grafted on Gisela 6 produced fruit with similar quality levels in both thesis. These results show how much the rootstock influences the physiological response of plants to multifunctional covers. “Keep-in-touch®” cover had no negative impact on plants grafted on a less vigorous rootstock (Gisela 6) while in CAB6P (more vigorous) the cover affected water and photosynthetic relationships within the canopy.

This led to a reduction of water and photo-assimilates toward the fruit, resulting in a decrease in diameter and soluble solids content. The results of this study lead to the conclusion that management solutions must be combined taking into account the different physiological response depending on the rootstock adopted.

Nets improved the water status of the plant by limiting light radiation without causing photosynthetic losses, which made them beneficial in combination with the more dwarfing rootstock. This was not the case when more vigorous rootstock was employed.

Excessive reduction of light ration in the canopy caused lower stomatal conductance and, consequently, reduced photosynthesis; however, it also reduced the water potential of the fruit, decreasing its attraction force for water and photo-assimilates, which led to lower fruit development and quality.

Source: Fonte: Morandi, B., Manfrini, L., Venturi, M., Bortolotti, G., Boini, A., Perulli, G., Bresilla, K., Corelli Grappadelli, L. and Lugli, S. (2022). Physiological effects of multi-functional nets applied to cherry trees grafted on rootstocks with different vigor. Acta Hortic. 1346, 35-42

Melissa Venturi
University of Bologna (IT)


Cherry Times - All rights reserved

What to read next

Eradicating Agrobacterium starts from the roots

Crop protection

23 Jul 2024

Researchers from the academies of agricultural and forestry sciences in Beijing (China) used the cherry cultivar ‘Haiying 1’, which is extremely resistant to crown gall, and ‘Gisela 6’, a cherry cultivar susceptible to crown gall, for grafting.

Bacterial cancer: plant defence response mechanisms discovered thanks to a study on the cherry transcriptome

Crop protection Press review

14 Dec 2023

The Santina variety, less susceptible to Pss infection, activates its response more quickly, differentially expressing 70% more genes than Bing (831 DEG). The plants of the Bing variety gradually strengthened their response, reaching, at 7 dpi, a more robust response (1471 DEG).

In evidenza

Sour cherry powder: benefits and uses of the new superfood compared to traditional juice

Health

29 Dec 2025

Sour cherry powder is a superfood rich in antioxidants, beneficial for sleep, muscles and inflammation. In this article, we discover how it is obtained, how it is used, how it differs from juice and why it is gaining a central role in modern healthy diets.

EU cherry consumption on the rise: 2024 set to be a record year for the last decade

Consumption

26 Dec 2025

In 2024, cherry consumption in the European Union reached 629,000 tonnes, marking a +4.5% increase on an annual basis and reaching its highest level in ten years. Production, imports and exports are also growing, with Italy and Spain among the leading countries.

Tag Popolari