X-disease threat lower in Oregon: leafhoppers less effective than in Washington

09 Jun 2025
176

X-disease alert eases in Oregon: phytoplasma vectors are less aggressive than in Washington. A different composition of leafhopper species explains why Oregon cherries are less affected by X-disease—a disease still worrying producers in Washington.

While many U.S. cherry-growing areas remain on high alert for X-disease—or “little cherry disease”—Oregon growers appear to be breathing a bit easier.

Unlike in Washington State, where infected trees are often removed in large numbers, the disease’s incidence in Oregon is lower. The reason? It comes down to the insects.

Different leafhoppers, different risks

X-disease is caused by a phytoplasma transmitted by various leafhopper species. However, not all seem equally efficient at spreading the pathogen.

In The Dalles—Oregon’s primary sweet cherry production region—the dominant species is Euscelidius variegatus, which accounts for about 80% of the local leafhopper population.

According to Chris Adams, entomologist at Oregon State University’s Mid-Columbia Agricultural Research and Extension Center, E. variegatus is capable of transmitting the phytoplasma, but it does so less efficiently than other species.

This is partly because it primarily lives in the drive rows between trees and rarely enters the canopy, where it could infect the plants.

Another key factor is the time required to become infectious: even after feeding on an infected plant, E. variegatus takes a long time to carry and transmit the pathogen.

In the 1950s, researchers in California had to inject it with the pathogen just to study its behavior.

Not all leafhopper species are alike. Among those proven to transmit X-disease in stone fruits, geographic distribution varies. The predominant species in Oregon’s Columbia Gorge growing region is Euscelidius variegatus (1), a less efficient vector compared to the main culprit in infected Washington orchards, Colladonus reductus (2). Colladonus geminatus (3) sometimes appears in north-central Washington but is not the main concern. (Photo courtesy of César A. Reyes Corral/Washington State University)

Washington remains under pressure

The situation is quite different in southern Washington, where the main leafhopper vector is Colladonus reductus, which is much more efficient at spreading X-disease.

Complicating matters is Colladonus geminatus, a longtime nemesis of the sector since the 1950s. Though less common today, it still appears, especially around the Wenatchee area.

As Tobin Northfield, entomologist at Washington State University, points out, pressure remains high in that region: an infected tree must be removed immediately, as there is no cure for the disease.

Fewer tree removals in Oregon, more research

In Oregon, growers have removed fewer hectares compared to their Washington counterparts.

This has allowed researchers like Adams to focus on studying the life cycle and behavior of E. variegatus, including controlled releases of the insect in experimental blocks.

Such practices would be deemed too risky in the presence of more infectious species like C. reductus.

Ashley Thompson, Oregon State University Extension specialist, notes that some local growers remain cautious and remove suspect trees at the first sign of infection, while others take a more wait-and-see approach.

Overall, however, concern is shifting elsewhere: tomato ringspot virus—spread by nematodes—and insects such as the spotted-wing drosophila and the western cherry fruit fly are currently more feared.

And if there’s anything truly keeping growers awake at night, it’s labor costs, bureaucracy, and market access.

“For many, X-disease is no longer at the top of the emergency list,” Thompson concludes.

Text and internal image source: goodfruit

Opening image source: Michel Ehrhardt


Cherry Times - All rights reserved

What to read next

Innovative rootstock techniques to combat root rot in the cherry tree

Rootstocks

27 Dec 2024

Gasic, leader of the four-year, $5 million project funded by the USDA Specialty Crop Research Initiative, said there is still much to discover. For instance: Armillaria-resistant rootstocks that are compatible with cherry trees have yet to be found.

The profitability of sour cherry cultivation in Turkey: cost analysis and opportunities

Production

14 Feb 2025

Data collected from 138 farms show that the average gross production value per hectare is approximately €9,998, with variations between €9,339 and €11,082. Production costs average €6,220 per farm, with a distribution of 41.13% in variable costs and 58.87% in fixed costs.

In evidenza

Cherries worldwide: Turkey, Chile and USA lead global production and exports

Markets

04 Jul 2025

Turkey is now the world's leading cherry producer, followed by Chile and the USA. Based on FAO data, historical trends and projections to 2028, this article offers a full overview of the global cherry market, key exporting nations and the strategies of major producing countries.

CherryTech 2025: the largest technical showcase of the cherry industry

Events

04 Jul 2025

CherryTech 2025 brought together more than 1,600 professionals in Chile to explore the future of cherry production. With masterclasses, expert forums, and cutting-edge research, the event highlighted the importance of innovation, pruning techniques, and sustainable practices.

Tag Popolari