There is something deeply Italian about the cherry supply chain: the remarkable ability to portray excellence while the world moves forward and we remain still.
This is especially true in the South, and in Puglia in particular; elsewhere, modern orchards are being planted, varieties are being renewed, rootstocks are being studied, and orchards are designed like quality-driven production systems. Here in Puglia, instead, the cherry tree continues to be treated like a historical monument: it is admired, defended in words, but never truly touched.
The contradiction is clear for everyone to see. Italian nurseries sell plants to Chile, Spain, Greece, Turkey, and even in Trentino new varieties are being planted, protected, and managed with modern systems. There, they become export cherries, with size, crunchiness, and shelf life designed to last for weeks on the market.
At this point, the question becomes inevitable: why are other countries able to invest in shelf life, logistics, and storability, while here in Southern Italy we are not?
It is not a matter of climate, nor of know-how. And it is not even a matter of genetics. It is, more simply, a supply chain issue. Elsewhere, cherries are treated as an industrial project. Decisions are made about what type of fruit to produce, for which market, and with what commercial lifespan. Covered orchards are designed, staggered harvests are planned, and varieties compatible with global logistics are selected.
Here in Puglia, which accounts for over 80% of national production, cherries too often remain just an agricultural matter. If it rains, it is a problem because fruit splits; if there is strong wind, it is a problem because of blemishes; if the market demands continuity, it is a problem because there is no suitable product. And so the system moves in a fragmented way: nurseries innovate, growers resist, and traders, after investing millions of euros in machinery and grading lines, remain stuck. Everyone moves independently, while the supply chain stands still.
Meanwhile, the market is changing. Retailers no longer buy just good cherries: they buy reliable cherries. They want volume, consistency, and durability. They want fruit that can travel, sit on shelves, and reach consumers intact.
Other countries understood this years ago. They invested in varieties with longer shelf life, in protective covers, in high-density orchards, and in cold chain logistics. Meanwhile, we are still debating whether it is worth changing varieties.
And yet, it would be enough to look around to understand that the real risk is not innovation. The real risk is standing still while others build the market of the future.
Image source: Stefano Lugli
Donato Fanelli
Editore foglie
17 Mar 2026
Research in New Zealand and Australia examines how rain, protective covers, humidity and calcium affect cherry firmness and fruit quality. The project aims to help growers manage increasingly unpredictable weather and safeguard high-value export markets worldwide today.
14 Jun 2024
"This funding will go to over 60 partner organisations that will help create demand for US agricultural and food exports in high-potential markets around the world," said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.
30 Mar 2026
Hernán Garcés examines the new outlook for Chilean cherries, from reliance on China to premium quality, brand building and tighter margins. From Chile, a strategy is emerging focused on efficiency, consistency and value across the global supply chain.
30 Mar 2026
Field analysis in China of cherries shipped from Chile highlights the critical role of postharvest management. Extended storage, long transit times, and market saturation require advanced packaging solutions to preserve freshness, ensure quality, and reduce losses.
