An integrated model for assessing the postharvest quality of cherries following hydrocooling

22 Oct 2026
15

Maintaining cherry quality after harvest requires rapid and effective interventions to limit fruit metabolic activity and slow down degradation processes during storage.

In this context, hydrocooling is an interesting technique for rapidly removing field heat, reducing respiration rates and limiting fruit quality losses.

However, assessing cooling effectiveness by considering individual chemical, physical and microbiological parameters may provide only a partial picture of product condition.

A recent study from Ukraine addressed this issue by developing a mathematical model based on so-called factor areas, designed to integrate multiple indicators into a quantitative and visually interpretable assessment of sweet and sour cherry quality.

Hydrocooling and experimental design

The study examined three sweet cherry cultivars, ‘Valeriy Chkalov’, ‘Krupnoplidna’ and ‘Melitopolska Chorna’, and one sour cherry cultivar, ‘Vstrecha’.

The fruit underwent cooling in water at approximately 1 °C, supplemented with lactic and acetic acids at experimentally determined concentrations.

The treatment continued until the temperature inside the fruit, near the stone, reached approximately 2 °C.

The assessment considered 15 indicators, divided into ten negative parameters, whose increase indicates a deterioration in quality, and five positive parameters associated with the preservation of nutritional and commercial value.

Indicators and quality profile

The former included weight loss, respiration rate, heat production, microbial growth and enzyme activity; the latter included sugar content, soluble solids, titratable acidity, ascorbic acid and phenolic compounds.

The measured values were normalised against predefined reference values and plotted on polar charts, in which the resulting area summarises the product’s quality profile.

Cooling results

The results indicate that hydrocooling helped preserve the positive indicators: the area of favourable factors (Spos) ranged from 2.35 to 2.37 conventional square units, while the quality maintenance coefficient ranged from 0.99 to 1.00.

At the same time, the main negative indicators decreased.

In three of the four cultivars, respiration rate and heat production fell to less than half their initial levels; the abundance of mesophilic microorganisms and fungi was also generally lower after treatment.

The coefficient representing the reduction in negative impacts ranged from 44.20% to 49.73%, indicating a beneficial effect under the experimental conditions.

Cultivar differences

The integrated assessment also revealed differences among cultivars. ‘Krupnoplidna’ showed the most favourable overall profile, with the smallest negative-factor area and the highest coefficient for reducing negative impacts.

Conversely, the results for ‘Melitopolska Chorna’ suggested a less favourable response under the conditions investigated.

Applications and limitations of the model

The main contribution of the study lies in the possibility of comparing cultivars and treatments using a composite indicator while retaining visibility of the individual factors contributing to the overall result.

The model could therefore support the assessment of postharvest technologies and the optimisation of cooling and storage protocols.

However, it is important to note that the cooling solution contained organic acids and that separate controls using water alone or no treatment were not included. Consequently, the effects of cooling cannot be distinguished from those of the acids.

Furthermore, the model was tested on only four cultivars and requires validation across a wider range of genotypes, growing environments and storage periods.

This approach therefore provides a promising basis for complementing conventional analyses, but its ability to predict actual storage life and commercial losses requires further investigation.

Source: Palamarchuk, I., Ivanova, І., Bal-Prylypko, L., Palamarchuk, V., Mushtruk, M., Drobitko, A., Lialyk, A., & Pyurko, O. (2026). Factor-area modelling of sweet cherry and sour cherry quality after hydrocooling treatment. Scifood, 20, 599-620. https://doi.org/10.5219/scifood.162

Image source: Stefano Lugli

Andrea Giovannini
PhD in Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science and Technology - Arboriculture and Fruitculture, University of Bologna, IT 


Cherry Times - All rights reserved

What to read next

A new discovery from the University of Chile for controlling grey mould in cherries

Crop protection

15 Sep 2026

University of Chile researchers identified a Streptomyces strain from the Atacama Desert and Trench able to inhibit Botrytis cinerea. The FONDEF project with AgroFresh is now moving into direct fruit trials and edible postharvest coatings for fresh Chile export produce.

Cracking: when it rains, it pours

Crop protection Tech management

12 May 2023

Rain cracking is a serious physiopathy found in many fruits, especially cherries. Cracking causes enormous economic damage, both direct and indirect, and is set to become an increasingly important problem.

In evidenza

The onset of dormancy and the quality of dormancy are key factors in predicting the productive potential of a cherry orchard

Tech management

22 Oct 2026

Cherry production is shaped in autumn: irrigation, stored reserves and dormancy affect bud fertility and winter-chill response. Orchard data help estimate crop loads and plan winter pruning, guiding timely decisions on fruit size and next season’s yield in each orchard.

An integrated model for assessing the postharvest quality of cherries following hydrocooling

Post-harvest​

22 Oct 2026

A Ukrainian study tests hydrocooling in three sweet cherry cultivars and one sour cherry cultivar: water at 1°C with organic acids, cooled to 2°C near the pit. It preserved positive indicators and cut negative impact by up to 49.73%, with effects varying by cultivar.

Tag Popolari