Michigan cherry growers are worried about cherry leaf spot
20 Feb 2025
Cherry leaf spot is a challenge for Michigan growers due to fungicide resistance and climatic conditions. MSU research has identified effective copper-based fungicides.
Take the time before the season to think about possible strategies to implement in each plot on the farm, based on:
Protection against Drosophila suzukii must be implemented from the beginning of veraison. All varieties are susceptible to attack. The strategies implemented must be able to respond to the specific situations in the orchards.
All ripening windows require protection against D. suzukii, which should be implemented as soon as the first signs of colouring appear. In general, in-season varieties are subject to the greatest pest pressure, because the climate favours the development of Drosophila and because of the synchronisation between ripening and the flight curve. However, the other ripening windows should not be neglected:
NB: In case of very high D. suzukii pressure (detection of the first damage in the plot or in neighbouring plots), it may be useful to apply an adulticide product after the first harvest. In this case, only a product with a 3-day ARD (see tables on page 5) can be used to ensure a second pass.
It is necessary to monitor population trends in order to detect early flights and, if necessary, implement control measures. To do this:
One caveat: once the fruits are ripe in the orchard, the insects are more attracted to them than to the trap. The correlation between trapping levels in a plot and the level of damage has not been proven.
Everything possible must be done to prevent the insect from spreading in orchards. The implementation of prophylactic measures generally improves the situation. It is therefore recommended to:
The following table shows the products with a permanent marketing authorisation:
Product (active substance) | Marketing authorisation | Max. number of applications | ARfD | Range of action |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARGICAL PRO (kaolin) - usable in AB | Permanent marketing authorisation | 1 (at the beginning of veraison) | - | Adult insects |
DELEGATE (spinetoram) | Permanent marketing authorisation | 1 | 3 days | Adult insects |
KARATE ZEON (lambda cyhalothrine) | Permanent marketing authorisation | 2 | 7 days | Adult insects |
DECIS PROTECH (deltametrina) | Permanent marketing authorisation | 3 | 7 days | Adult insects |
NATURALIS (Beauveria bassiana) - usable in AB | Permanent marketing authorisation | 5 (minimum range of 5 days) | 3 days | Adult insects |
MOVENTO (spirotetramat) | Permanent marketing authorisation | 2 (minimum range of 14 days) | 21 days | Adult insects |
The following table shows the products for which a 120-day AIC application was obtained in 2024:
Product (active substance) | Marketing authorisation | Max. number of applications | ARfD | Range of action |
---|---|---|---|---|
EXIREL (Cyantranilprole) | 120 days obtained from 04/01/2024 to 07/30/2024 | 3 (minimum range of 10 days) | 3 days | Adult insects |
SUCCESS 4 (spinosad) - usable in AB | 120 days obtained from 04/01/2024 to 07/30/2024 | 2 | 7 days | Adult insects |
AFFIRM (emamectin) | 120 days obtained from 04/01/2024 to 07/30/2024 | 3 (minimum range of 7 days) | 7 days | Adult insects |
SOKALCIARBO (kaolin) - usable in AB | 120 days obtained from 04/01/2024 to 07/30/2024 | 5 (minimum range of 4-5 days) | 3 days | Adult insects |
To consult the list of 120j AdGs.: http://agriculture.gouv.fr/produits-phytopharmaceutiques-autorisations-de-mise-sur-le-marche-dune-duree-maximale-de-120-jours. For all authorized products: https://ephy.anses.fr.
Several efficacy tests were carried out on some of the products mentioned, which allowed us to derive their efficacy range:
The efficacy ranges are given as a guide, and application of the products does not guarantee similar results. Climatic conditions may affect the effectiveness of the solutions: for example, under hot and dry conditions, NATURALIS (Beauvaria bassiana) is less effective.
Examples of phytosanitary treatment routes based on these commercial products are described in treatment guides (e.g., the guide to rational and biological protection "South Arbo 2024") or can be consulted by supporting organizations.
Protection strategies implemented in the field must be adapted to the specific conditions of each orchard. To limit the risk of resistance development, it is recommended to alternate the active substances used.
In 2023, the CTIFL launched a trial to evaluate protection strategies. The results are available on the CTIFL website: https://www.ctifl.fr/comparaison-de-strategies-utilisables-en-agriculture-conventionnelle-et/ou-en-agriculture-biologique.
Six strategies were compared, two of which can be used in organic farming. These strategies are based on products available with perennial marketing authorization or 120-day marketing authorization in 2023.
Efficacy evaluations were carried out on the two flies on the fruits: Drosophila suzukii and Rhagoletis cerasi. The efficacy of the evaluated strategies ranged from 61% to 97%, while the untreated control showed 30% damage. These results were obtained with respect to the soil and climatic conditions and pest pressure specific to the test plot. Application of these strategies does not necessarily guarantee equivalent results to those obtained.
Physical protection with networks (monorang, monoparcelle or peripheral)
The effectiveness of protection with nets (monorang and monoparcelle) has been demonstrated in cherry orchards. With totally 'watertight' nets (alt'droso mesh, without holes, with good joints on the ground or around trunks), the effectiveness is 100%. A change in climate has been observed under single-cell nets (higher temperatures at warmer times and higher relative humidity in the absence of wind).
Although nets require a significant investment, in the current context of gradual withdrawal of active substances, they are the most effective means of protection. They are easiest to install in new plantations, although goblet orchards can be adapted.
A word of warning: their installation alters the technical itineraries of the orchard and particular attention must be paid to the possible appearance of other pests: aphids, mites, etc.
The effectiveness of perimeter nets is variable and limited depending on the sites and years of experimentation. Netting alone does not provide sufficient protection for orchards: its effectiveness in the 18 trials ranged from 0 to 66%. This type of net is still being studied together with other partial effect levers.
Use of mass trapping
The objective of mass trapping is to capture large numbers of D. suzukii in and around crops to reduce damage. Mass trapping systems have been studied for D. suzukii. To date, these systems have not proved effective in trials conducted in France on cherries and strawberries under high pressure conditions when used alone.
The date of placement of the traps seems to play an important role in the results obtained: if they are placed too late (less than 28 days before harvest), they are ineffective. Conversely, if traps are placed early (at least 45 days before harvest), there is a clear benefit in most situations.
In 9 trials conducted between 2019 and 2021 with massive traps placed more than four weeks before harvest, TRAP DECIS, added to grower strategies, was on average 42% more effective than grower strategies without traps. The break time of this trap was about 3 hours per hectare and did not require reloading of the attractants.
The following table shows the traps with permanent marketing authorisation:
Traps (active substance) | Target | Number of traps | Fases of application |
---|---|---|---|
DECIS TRAP DS (deltamethrin) | Drosophila suzukii | 100 traps / hectare | Min: 69 - Max: 90 |
FLYPACK SUZUKII (deltamethrin) | Drosophila suzukii | 100 traps / hectare | Min: 69 - Max: 79 |
DECIS TRAP MC (deltamethrin) | Rhagoletis cerasi | 100 traps / hectare | Min: 70 |
FLYPACK CERASI (deltamethrin) | Rhagoletis cerasi | 100 traps / hectare | Min: 70 |
KENOTRAP COMPLET (esfenvalerate) | Fruit flies | 75 traps / hectare | Min: 71 |
VIO-TRAP usable in AB (deltamethrin + hydrolysed proteins) | Fruit flies | 160 traps / hectare | Min: 79 - Max: 89 |
Native parasitoids
Several species of native Drosophila parasitoids were studied in order to identify parasites capable of controlling D. suzukii. Of the five species studied, only one was selected: Trichopria drosophilae. This pupal parasitoid showed the most interesting parasitism rate in the laboratory. Tests on cherry trees showed that the parasitoid has little resistance to the climatic conditions of south-eastern France.
In orchards where parasitoids have been introduced, the application of insecticides may impair the development and thus the action of T. drosophilae.
Exotic parasitoids
After several years of laboratory studies, the parasitoid Ganaspis cf. brasiliensis has been shown to significantly reduce the population of D. suzukii three weeks after its introduction. It is also the most specific parasitoid for this fly. The application for authorisation to introduce the parasitoid was obtained in August 2022. The first introductions of the parasitoid were made in September and October 2023 in different regions of France on behalf of INRAE.
Further releases and post-introduction monitoring will take place in 2024. This means of protection still needs to be studied before it can be applied by producers.
The Drosophila suzukii project, financed by the French Office for Biodiversity (OFB) and led by CTIFL in collaboration with INRAE, started in January 2024 and will last three years. All research topics are included in the project: knowledge of the fly, the evaluation of protection methods (synthetic and biocontrol products, biological control, new application methods, physical control, sterile insect technique), work on varietal leverage and the creation of the most suitable plots for D. suzukii management.
Other funded projects complement the search for solutions, such as the Plan alternatives d'urgence phytosanitaire fruits et légumes (2023-2025) and the STRATOS project (2024-2027).
Source: Protection des cerisiers contre Drosophila suzukii, Éléments techniques à prendre en considération en 2024, Note de synthèse - Cahiers Environnement-Sécurité, 04/2024, CTIFL, https://www.ctifl.fr/protection-des-cerisiers-contre-drosophila-suzukii-elements-techniques-a-prendre-en-consideration-en-2024.
20 Feb 2025
Cherry leaf spot is a challenge for Michigan growers due to fungicide resistance and climatic conditions. MSU research has identified effective copper-based fungicides.
23 Dec 2024
The particular characteristics of this fruit make it one of the most susceptible fruits to cracking due to rainfall. In the following paragraphs, researchers from the Universidad de Talca address the causes of this issue and some prevention strategies.
02 Apr 2025
Thermal imaging is an innovative method to monitor water stress in 'Regina' cherry trees. Optimising irrigation, improving water management and reducing water wastage, without compromising productivity and fruit quality.
02 Apr 2025
Gene Drive could revolutionise biological control of Drosophila suzukii, the red-eyed midge that threatens cherry trees and small fruits. Find out how this advanced biotechnology could lead to the collapse of the pest's population.