Surface pitting is a significant postharvest disorder in sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). It reduces fruit appearance and market value and shortens shelf life by increasing decay risk.
A recent three-year study in the Czech Republic examined how fruit quality and storage conditions influence the reduction of this disorder.
Pitting shows up as small depressions on the cherry skin caused mainly by impacts and compression during harvest and handling.
This issue affects up to 80% of cherries in commercial supply chains — often more than fungal decay. It facilitates microbial invasion and moisture imbalance, accelerating spoilage.
The study evaluated 35 sweet cherry genotypes: 32 breeding accessions and three cultivars (‘Van’, ‘Regina’, and ‘Sweetheart’) over three seasons. Fruit firmness, size, and soluble solids content (SSC) were measured.
Surface pitting was mechanically induced to mimic handling damage. Afterward, fruits were stored for 21 days at 1.5 °C and 85% relative humidity under four storage conditions:
Surface pitting resistance was measured using a Resistance Index (RI), scaled from 1 (no damage) to 4 (severe damage). RI values varied widely between genotypes — from 1.31 ± 0.26 (‘10072’, most resistant) to 2.72 ± 0.45 (‘16806’, least resistant).
Firmness showed a strong negative correlation with RI (r = –0.606, p < 0.001), meaning firmer cherries suffered less damage.
SSC and fruit size were weakly or not significantly correlated with RI (r = –0.022 and r = –0.07 respectively), indicating sweetness and size are poor predictors of resistance.
Harvest maturity had a minor effect on pitting susceptibility:
‘Van’ demonstrated moderate tolerance (RI = 2.07 ± 0.22). ‘Regina’ (2.37 ± 0.51) and ‘Sweetheart’ (2.14 ± 0.35) were more susceptible.
Most breeding accessions performed better than ‘Regina’, with some exceeding ‘Sweetheart’ and ‘Van’ in firmness and resistance, indicating successful selection for resilience.
Among storage treatments:
In tests on cultivar ‘Tamara’ under induced damage:
Applying ozone and 1-MCP before mechanical damage significantly improved effectiveness.
Proactive treatment before handling stress enhances fruit resilience. Reactive treatments — particularly ozone after damage — can worsen injury.
Surface pitting resistance mainly depends on genotype, with fruit firmness as the key marker.
Harvest maturity plays a modest role, while treatment timing critically influences results.
For breeding and commercial practice:
Classificazione dei frutti in categorie da 1 a 4 (da sinistra a destra) secondo il grado di danno durante la valutazione. Suran et al. (2025). (Crediti immagine: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11070716).
Tabel 1. Comparison of key qualitative parameters in sweet cherry fruits across two harvest periods. The table summarizes mean values and standard deviations (SD) for Fruit Firmness, Fruit Size, Soluble Solids Content (SSC) and Resistance Index. Suran et al. (2025). (Image credits: ttps://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11070716).
| Variable | 1st harvest | SD | 2nd harvest | SD | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit Firmness (g/mm) | 210.74 | 25.46 | 201.31 | 20.99 | < 0.001 |
| Fruit Size (mm) | 25.32 | 2.22 | 25.86 | 2.23 | < 0.001 |
| SSC (°Brix) | 13.44 | 2.77 | 14.67 | 2.32 | < 0.001 |
| Resistance Index | 2.12 | 0.48 | 2.14 | 0.45 | > 0.05 |
Table 2. Correlation matrix showing Spearman correlation coefficients and p-values (*p < 0.05) for the relationships between Fruit Firmness, Fruit Size, Soluble Solids Content, and *Resistance Index. Suran et al. (2025). (Image credits: ttps://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11070716).
| Variable | Fruit firmness | Fruit size | Soluble solids content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit Firmness | 1 | -0.365* | -0.304* |
| Fruit Size | -0.365* | 1 | 0.257* |
| Soluble Solids Content | -0.304* | 0.257* | 1 |
| *Resistance Index | -0.606* | -0.069 | -0.022 |
*RI scoring criteria: 1- no visible damage; 2- mild surface indentations; 3- moderate pitting; 4- extensive or deep pitting.
Figure 2. Analysis of the variability in the resistance index of cherry genotypes against surface pitting (Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance; p < 0.05). Suran et al. (2025). (Image credits: ttps://doi.org/10.3390/ horticulturae11070716).
Figure 3. Analysis of the relationship between storage condition type and the resistance index of sweet cherry accessions (Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance; p < 0.05). Suran et al. (2025). (Image credits: ttps://doi.org/10.3390/ horticulturae11070716).
Figure 4. Analysis of the relationship between storage condition type and the resistance index of sweet cherry ‘Tamara’. Suran et al. (2025). (Image credits: ttps://doi.org/10.3390/ horticulturae11070716).
Opening image source: Portal fruiticola
Pavol Suran
WSUO (CZ)
26 Sep 2025
A Greek study has developed a predictive model to estimate nutrient loss in cherry orchards. Based only on fresh fruit yield data, it enables more accurate and sustainable fertilization management while actively promoting recycling of pruning and leaf residues.
16 May 2024
According to the president of the Regulatory Body, "there have been no meteorological problems other than those usual for this time of year in spring. Despite the rains, in full bloom, a harvest of 400 tons of Navalinda and about 2,000 or 3,000 tons of picota is estimated".
12 Mar 2026
Cherry bacterial canker caused by Pseudomonas syringae can severely damage orchards and reduce yields. Recent studies examine bacteriophages as a biocontrol strategy and highlight the role of bacterial antiviral defence systems in developing effective treatments.
12 Mar 2026
Founded in Zara in 1821, the Luxardo distillery built its reputation with Maraschino liqueur. After World War II destroyed the original plant, the family rebuilt the company in Italy’s Euganean Hills, preserving a historic tradition in cherry liqueur production.
