Estimating flower density in cherry orchards using AI and smartphones

31 Aug 2026
576

 In brief. As part of a field service in Romeral, Chile, for a Chilean export company, we tested whether artificial intelligence applied to ordinary smartphone photos could make the pre-season estimate of a cherry block's floral offer faster and more representative. The finding was not a single universal model but a rule: in open canopies, direct dart detection works; in dense, occluded ones, detection fails and plant structure becomes the better predictor.

The problem. Estimating the floral offer before the season relies on counting fruiting darts by eye, plant by plant. It is slow, operator-dependent and rarely georeferenced, leaving growers with a single global figure that says nothing about the variability within a block. More capable hardware exists, from vehicle-mounted sensors to multi-view 3D reconstruction, but such systems need terrain a vehicle can drive, which steep slopes and narrow, high-density rows do not always allow.

We deliberately chose the tool the grower already carries: the smartphone, one quick photo per plant, fast enough to sample many plants and gain representativeness.

How it works

How it works. A single image never captures every dart because of occlusion, so the model does not count directly: it learns the relation between what the AI detects and what is really there, calibrated with manual counts. This limitation is not unique to smartphones; even advanced systems must be calibrated for occluded structures.

Both detection and structural analysis run through Phenoria, a smartphone-based phenotyping tool for fruit trees that turns a single photo into structural and floral-load data, currently in development, with more news coming soon.

Figure 1. Direct AI dart detection performs best in open-canopy orchards with minimal occlusion, whereas structural segmentation adds noise when darts are clearly visible.

Dense canopies

Figure 2. In dense canopies with high occlusion, direct dart detection fails; estimation using plant structural segmentation serves as a more reliable proxy for load capacity.

What we found. Across several orchards, occlusion decided which method worked. In open canopies, dart detection reached an R² of 0.53 in validation, enough to map load zones though not to predict single plants. In dense canopies, detection collapsed; modeling load from plant structure alone recovered a usable signal, an R² of 0.24, enough to separate high-load from low-load zones.

The most revealing result: under severe occlusion, adding dart detection to the structural model made it worse. When you cannot see the darts, you measure the tree that bears them.

Spatial variability

Figure 3. Spatial variability map generated from single-photo sampling points (orange dots), dividing the block into two distinct management zones displaying mean estimated dart count +- standard deviation.

The takeaway. There is no universal predictor: open canopies favor counting, dense canopies favor structure, both from one accessible photo. And a low R² is not a useless model, it depends on the decision it must support: ranking a block into zones demands far less precision than predicting one plant, and it is exactly what a grower needs to act early.

The broader aim is to extract the maximum plant information from a single smartphone photo, throughout the season. Agtech must solve real field problems with what growers already carry.

José Salinas Navarrete
Geospectra


Cherry Times - All rights reserved

What to read next

Phenological models for optimized orchard management

Tech management

16 May 2024

The aim of the research was to develop and validate phenological models for eight sweet cherry varieties. The stochastic single-molecule approach facilitated a better understanding of phenology prerequisites, providing valuable data for agricultural management.

Bad weather in Veneto (IT): cracking on early varieties and Drosophila suzukii feared

Tech management

16 May 2024

The start of the harvest, originally scheduled for May 20th, will be compromised by the impending losses due to prolonged rains and low temperatures for the season, while late varieties, with a delay in ripening, seem to have been saved for the moment.

In evidenza

Monitoring processing times is essential to ensure cherry quality

Post-harvest​

30 Oct 2026

Managing processing times means ensuring that fruit moves from harvesting to cooling with as few interruptions as possible. The aim is to reduce waiting, balance capacity across the different stages, prevent accumulation and identify bottlenecks before they compromise fruit condi

Smaller US crop raises concerns over cherry supply

Production

30 Oct 2026

Although lower production may put upward pressure on prices, the extent of any increases will depend on demand, existing supplies and supplier-specific market conditions.

Tag Popolari