Parasitoid interactions on Drosophila suzukii: impact on biological control in EU and USA

27 Aug 2025
2611

Parasitoids of Drosophila spp. are mainly species that attack the larval or pupal stages. In koinobiont larval parasitoids such as Ganaspis kimorum, the host is not killed immediately but only after pupation.

This creates the possibility that already-parasitized pupae can be attacked by pupal parasitoids, leading to cases of multiparasitism or, in some situations, hyperparasitism. Ganaspis kimorum, recently introduced into Europe and the United States within classical biological control programs against Drosophila suzukii, is a highly specific and effective insect in its native range.

However, in new introduction environments it may interact with resident pupal parasitoids such as Pachycrepoideus vindemiae and Trichopria drosophilae, which may influence its effectiveness.

Interactions among parasitoids

A recent study evaluated the interactions between these pupal parasitoids and G. kimorum, using both D. suzukii and D. melanogaster pupae as hosts (the latter parasitized by Leptopilina heterotoma).

The aim was to determine the ability of pupal parasitoids to parasitize already-attacked hosts, their developmental success, possible host preferences, and competitive mechanisms.

In no-choice tests, both pupal parasitoids oviposited in healthy hosts as well as in parasitized ones. However, only P. vindemiae was able to complete development on multiparasitized pupae, with a lower success rate compared to healthy hosts and with a reduction in the proportion of females in the offspring.

T. drosophilae, on the other hand, was never able to complete development in the presence of mature larval parasitoids, successfully emerging only from unparasitized hosts.

Observations and developmental outcomes

In choice tests, both parasitoids showed a preference for healthy pupae. Moreover, the proportion of females in the progeny did not show significant variation under these conditions.

Stereomicroscopic observations provided further insight into the mechanisms of interaction. In the case of P. vindemiae, after oviposition in pupae containing third-instar larvae of G. kimorum, the pupal parasitoid larva initially fed on the D. suzukii pupa and, after 8–10 days, also consumed the larva of G. kimorum.

This behavior indicates a form of physiological suppression or intrinsic competition, systematically preventing the emergence of G. kimorum from multiparasitized hosts.

In contrast, when T. drosophilae was placed in contact with the same hosts, G. kimorum successfully completed its development, thereby preventing the survival of the pupal parasitoid.

Implications for biological control

These results indicate that while P. vindemiae prefers healthy hosts, it has the capacity to compromise the development of G. kimorum, thus reducing its potential as a biological control agent.

By contrast, T. drosophilae appears to have a much more limited impact, restricted to non-reproductive effects caused by the developmental failure of both species.

Therefore, the simultaneous integration of larval and pupal parasitoids could reduce the effectiveness of D. suzukii control, especially in the presence of highly competitive pupal species such as P. vindemiae.

Careful planning is thus required: T. drosophilae could be used in targeted early-season interventions to reduce overwintering populations, while the use of P. vindemiae should be limited or avoided in contexts where G. kimorum is establishing.

Conclusions and recommendations

In conclusion, an in-depth understanding of interspecific interactions among biological control agents is essential to prevent competitive conflicts and to ensure the long-term stability of biological control programs.

Source: Lisi, F., Rogers, D. V., Henry, E. E., Hogg, B. N., Biondi, A., Wang, X., & Daane, K. M. (2025). Potential interactions of larval and pupal drosophila parasitoids and their implications for biological control of Drosophila suzukii. Biological Control, 204, 105756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105756 

Image source: EPPO

Andrea Giovannini
University of Bologna (ITA)


Italian Berry - All rights reserved

What to read next

Cherries and climate: how new varieties are helping Australian farmers

Varieties

16 Oct 2024

Developed by the international breeding company Bloom Fresh, the low-temperature varieties have been planted with the hope of increasing supply to meet the appetite of Australians and exports for these festive fruits.

Frutas de Chile reveals Chile's top 10 exporters in the 2023-2024 season

Press review

26 Feb 2024

Up to the sixth week, 82,452,392 five-kilo cases of cherries were exported in the 2023/2024 season, and although this figure is lower than the 83,220,842 cases exported in the 2022/2023 season, the figures are predictable after a difficult year for producers.

In evidenza

Frequent rainfall is putting Chilean cherry production and the cherry market at risk

Production

23 Oct 2026

Spring rains in Chile have split early cherries in the north, while damage in O’Higgins, which accounts for over 80% of production, remains marginal so far. Growers are monitoring fungal disease, saturated soils and potential impacts on Chile’s 2026/27 cherry crop.

Sviluppo di varietà di ciliegie dolci cilene resistenti ai cambiamenti climatici per i mercati di esportazione

Breeding

23 Oct 2026

Da 14 anni, il PMGCe della PUC in Cile seleziona varietà precoci di ciliegio, a basso fabbisogno in freddo e resistenti a caldo, siccità e cracking. Tre selezioni avanzate e 1.000 individui sono valutati in quattro siti: l’obiettivo è registrare una varietà entro il 2030.

Tag Popolari