Parasitoids of Drosophila spp. are mainly species that attack the larval or pupal stages. In koinobiont larval parasitoids such as Ganaspis kimorum, the host is not killed immediately but only after pupation.
This creates the possibility that already-parasitized pupae can be attacked by pupal parasitoids, leading to cases of multiparasitism or, in some situations, hyperparasitism. Ganaspis kimorum, recently introduced into Europe and the United States within classical biological control programs against Drosophila suzukii, is a highly specific and effective insect in its native range.
However, in new introduction environments it may interact with resident pupal parasitoids such as Pachycrepoideus vindemiae and Trichopria drosophilae, which may influence its effectiveness.
A recent study evaluated the interactions between these pupal parasitoids and G. kimorum, using both D. suzukii and D. melanogaster pupae as hosts (the latter parasitized by Leptopilina heterotoma).
The aim was to determine the ability of pupal parasitoids to parasitize already-attacked hosts, their developmental success, possible host preferences, and competitive mechanisms.
In no-choice tests, both pupal parasitoids oviposited in healthy hosts as well as in parasitized ones. However, only P. vindemiae was able to complete development on multiparasitized pupae, with a lower success rate compared to healthy hosts and with a reduction in the proportion of females in the offspring.
T. drosophilae, on the other hand, was never able to complete development in the presence of mature larval parasitoids, successfully emerging only from unparasitized hosts.
In choice tests, both parasitoids showed a preference for healthy pupae. Moreover, the proportion of females in the progeny did not show significant variation under these conditions.
Stereomicroscopic observations provided further insight into the mechanisms of interaction. In the case of P. vindemiae, after oviposition in pupae containing third-instar larvae of G. kimorum, the pupal parasitoid larva initially fed on the D. suzukii pupa and, after 8–10 days, also consumed the larva of G. kimorum.
This behavior indicates a form of physiological suppression or intrinsic competition, systematically preventing the emergence of G. kimorum from multiparasitized hosts.
In contrast, when T. drosophilae was placed in contact with the same hosts, G. kimorum successfully completed its development, thereby preventing the survival of the pupal parasitoid.
These results indicate that while P. vindemiae prefers healthy hosts, it has the capacity to compromise the development of G. kimorum, thus reducing its potential as a biological control agent.
By contrast, T. drosophilae appears to have a much more limited impact, restricted to non-reproductive effects caused by the developmental failure of both species.
Therefore, the simultaneous integration of larval and pupal parasitoids could reduce the effectiveness of D. suzukii control, especially in the presence of highly competitive pupal species such as P. vindemiae.
Careful planning is thus required: T. drosophilae could be used in targeted early-season interventions to reduce overwintering populations, while the use of P. vindemiae should be limited or avoided in contexts where G. kimorum is establishing.
In conclusion, an in-depth understanding of interspecific interactions among biological control agents is essential to prevent competitive conflicts and to ensure the long-term stability of biological control programs.
Source: Lisi, F., Rogers, D. V., Henry, E. E., Hogg, B. N., Biondi, A., Wang, X., & Daane, K. M. (2025). Potential interactions of larval and pupal drosophila parasitoids and their implications for biological control of Drosophila suzukii. Biological Control, 204, 105756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105756
Image source: EPPO
Andrea Giovannini
University of Bologna (ITA)
03 Jul 2024
In an in-depth study conducted by the University of Budapest (Hungary), the effectiveness of trunk injections was evaluated using four different pesticides against Rhagoletis cerasi. Among these, acetamiprid emerged as the most promising candidate.
18 Dec 2023
Argentinean cherry exports totalled 1,535 tonnes, a drop of 36 per cent compared to last year. Aníbal Caminiti claims that exportable volumes will recover as the harvest progresses and emphasised the quality of this season.
05 Dec 2025
South Africa’s cherry exports are growing fast: in 2024 over 800 hectares were in production. 60% go to the UK, followed by the EU and Middle East. China is the next frontier for 2026, with cold treatment protocols under evaluation to meet phytosanitary rules.
05 Dec 2025
Bloom Fresh cherries are transforming the global fruit market with new early and blush varieties. Grown in Chile, Spain, South Africa and France, premium selections like Cheery Glow and Cheery Treat meet rising demand from Asia, China and the United States.
