Parasitoid interactions on Drosophila suzukii: impact on biological control in EU and USA

27 Aug 2025
2343

Parasitoids of Drosophila spp. are mainly species that attack the larval or pupal stages. In koinobiont larval parasitoids such as Ganaspis kimorum, the host is not killed immediately but only after pupation.

This creates the possibility that already-parasitized pupae can be attacked by pupal parasitoids, leading to cases of multiparasitism or, in some situations, hyperparasitism. Ganaspis kimorum, recently introduced into Europe and the United States within classical biological control programs against Drosophila suzukii, is a highly specific and effective insect in its native range.

However, in new introduction environments it may interact with resident pupal parasitoids such as Pachycrepoideus vindemiae and Trichopria drosophilae, which may influence its effectiveness.

Interactions among parasitoids

A recent study evaluated the interactions between these pupal parasitoids and G. kimorum, using both D. suzukii and D. melanogaster pupae as hosts (the latter parasitized by Leptopilina heterotoma).

The aim was to determine the ability of pupal parasitoids to parasitize already-attacked hosts, their developmental success, possible host preferences, and competitive mechanisms.

In no-choice tests, both pupal parasitoids oviposited in healthy hosts as well as in parasitized ones. However, only P. vindemiae was able to complete development on multiparasitized pupae, with a lower success rate compared to healthy hosts and with a reduction in the proportion of females in the offspring.

T. drosophilae, on the other hand, was never able to complete development in the presence of mature larval parasitoids, successfully emerging only from unparasitized hosts.

Observations and developmental outcomes

In choice tests, both parasitoids showed a preference for healthy pupae. Moreover, the proportion of females in the progeny did not show significant variation under these conditions.

Stereomicroscopic observations provided further insight into the mechanisms of interaction. In the case of P. vindemiae, after oviposition in pupae containing third-instar larvae of G. kimorum, the pupal parasitoid larva initially fed on the D. suzukii pupa and, after 8–10 days, also consumed the larva of G. kimorum.

This behavior indicates a form of physiological suppression or intrinsic competition, systematically preventing the emergence of G. kimorum from multiparasitized hosts.

In contrast, when T. drosophilae was placed in contact with the same hosts, G. kimorum successfully completed its development, thereby preventing the survival of the pupal parasitoid.

Implications for biological control

These results indicate that while P. vindemiae prefers healthy hosts, it has the capacity to compromise the development of G. kimorum, thus reducing its potential as a biological control agent.

By contrast, T. drosophilae appears to have a much more limited impact, restricted to non-reproductive effects caused by the developmental failure of both species.

Therefore, the simultaneous integration of larval and pupal parasitoids could reduce the effectiveness of D. suzukii control, especially in the presence of highly competitive pupal species such as P. vindemiae.

Careful planning is thus required: T. drosophilae could be used in targeted early-season interventions to reduce overwintering populations, while the use of P. vindemiae should be limited or avoided in contexts where G. kimorum is establishing.

Conclusions and recommendations

In conclusion, an in-depth understanding of interspecific interactions among biological control agents is essential to prevent competitive conflicts and to ensure the long-term stability of biological control programs.

Source: Lisi, F., Rogers, D. V., Henry, E. E., Hogg, B. N., Biondi, A., Wang, X., & Daane, K. M. (2025). Potential interactions of larval and pupal drosophila parasitoids and their implications for biological control of Drosophila suzukii. Biological Control, 204, 105756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105756 

Image source: EPPO

Andrea Giovannini
University of Bologna (ITA)


Italian Berry - All rights reserved

What to read next

Cherries: when social media and consumers shape the Chinese market

Events

21 May 2025

China leads global cherry consumption, but Chilean exports face challenges from domestic economy, competition, food safety perceptions and social media pressure. The industry reflects on innovative strategies to protect its reputation and secure future growth.

The importance of water hygiene for post-harvest cherries

Post-harvest​

28 Jun 2024

Proper temperature management is a key factor for quality. Low temperatures (0ºC) and high humidity (90-95%) allow good quality for at least 2 weeks. However, with temperatures between 4º-6ºC this duration is reduced to 4-8 days.

In evidenza

Biological technology for controlling the fungi that cause wood rot in cherry trees

Crop protection

06 Aug 2026

Trunkguard, the biological inoculant developed by INIA, targets wood-decay fungi in cherry, apple, blueberry and European hazelnut while activating natural plant defenses. Greenhouse trials had promising results, particularly in cherry plants under controlled conditions.

Tasmanian cherry growers are adapting to climate change

Tech management

06 Aug 2026

A Tasmanian field trial is examining how rain covers affect orchard microclimate, light and cherry quality, helping growers manage hotter, drier summers, extreme rainfall and fruit cracking while protecting yields, premium production and the fruit’s commercial value now.

Tag Popolari