Sweet cherry productivity depends heavily on the efficiency of insect-mediated pollination, especially in modern orchards characterized by self-incompatible cultivars that require the transfer of compatible pollen between different varieties. A recent study conducted in 16 conventional sweet cherry orchards in central Chile investigated the role of the main floral visitors by analysing their foraging behaviour through a high-resolution video monitoring system.
The objective was to identify which insect groups possess traits that genuinely favour pollen transfer and, consequently, effective flower fertilization.
During the observations, more than 3,000 floral visits were recorded. Hymenoptera represented the dominant group, accounting for 65% of total visits, almost entirely attributable to the honey bee (Apis mellifera), while wild bees played only a marginal role.
Diptera accounted for about one-third of the visits, mainly due to the high abundance of Bibionidae belonging to the genus Dilophus and several hoverfly species. Beetles and Lepidoptera, on the other hand, were poorly represented.
The study revealed clear behavioural differences among the various insect groups. Bees exhibited the traits most favourable for pollination: very short visits to individual flowers, frequent movement between flowers, and regular direct contact with the stigma.
These characteristics are considered particularly important in self-incompatible systems, where successful fruit set depends on the insect’s ability to rapidly transfer pollen between flowers of different cultivars. Bumblebees and honey bees, in particular, showed stigma-contact rates exceeding 90%.
In contrast, many dipterans and beetles displayed less efficient pollination behaviour. Bibionidae, despite their high abundance, remained on the same flower for long periods and rarely came into contact with the reproductive structures.
Small beetles also showed extremely limited movement, often remaining within the same inflorescence for several minutes. This behaviour reduces pollen dispersal and limits the likelihood of cross-pollination.
Hoverflies showed an intermediate pattern: although they spent less time on flowers than other dipterans, they contacted the stigma mainly with their legs, a mechanism considered less effective for pollen transport than direct body contact.
Insect body size also showed a positive relationship with the probability of stigma contact. Larger insects, such as bumblebees, honey bees, and some large beetles, were much more likely to touch the flower’s reproductive structures during foraging.
In contrast, many small wild bees were able to feed without effectively contacting the stigma, thereby reducing their potential contribution to pollination.
The overall diversity of pollinators present in the conventional orchards studied was relatively low. Compared with European and North American systems, the Chilean orchards showed a very limited presence of medium- and large-bodied wild bees, which are generally considered among the most efficient sweet cherry pollinators.
Intensive orchard management and the limited availability of alternative habitats and floral resources likely penalized these species considerably.
Overall, the study confirms that the mere abundance of floral visitors is not sufficient to ensure high-quality pollination. Pollination effectiveness depends mainly on specific behavioural and morphological traits, including mobility between flowers, visitation speed, and frequency of stigma contact.
The findings therefore support the adoption of agronomic strategies aimed at increasing pollinator biodiversity, promoting the presence of wild bees, and reducing exclusive dependence on managed honey bee colonies, with potential benefits for both production stability and the ecological resilience of sweet cherry orchards.
Source: Rivers‐Moore, J., Murúa, M., & Zaviezo, T. (2026). Foraging Behaviour of Floral Visitors as an Indicator of Pollination Potential in Sweet Cherry Orchards. Journal of Applied Entomology, 150(4), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.70050
Image source: Stefano Lugli
Andrea Giovannini
PhD in Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science and Technology - Arboriculture and Fruitculture, University of Bologna, IT
11 Nov 2024
Pathogenicity tests showed that all isolated species could cause fruit infections, though with varying levels of aggressiveness. Among them, Diaporthe eres displayed the highest virulence followed by Fusarium incarnatum and Botryosphaeria dothidea.
08 Jan 2025
The surface pitting damage is caused by mechanical damage before and after harvest. The defect only manifests itself after 7-10 days of cold storage, after packing and inspection of the fruit, and has substantial economic implications.
04 Sep 2026
Strigolactones strengthen postharvest defenses in sweet cherries against Botrytis cinerea. Research on the Xianfeng cultivar shows that 0.1 μM reduces gray mold, lesion development and fungal biomass by activating phenylpropanoids, flavonoids and defense proteins.
04 Sep 2026
Managing frost damage in cherry trees requires action from dormancy breaking through vegetative growth. Preventing ice nucleation, protecting cell membranes, and controlling Pseudomonas and bacterial canker can help preserve orchard health, resilience, and productivity.
