Sterile Insect Technique in Drosophila suzukii: bisexual releases do not compromise control efficacy

24 Apr 2026
826

The sustainable management of Drosophila suzukii, one of the most damaging pests in fruit crops, represents a major challenge, particularly in light of increasing restrictions on insecticide use.

In this context, the sterile insect technique (SIT) is emerging as a promising strategy within integrated pest management, based on the mass release of sterilized individuals to reduce the reproductive potential of natural populations.

Traditionally, SIT relies on the exclusive release of sterile males, as only their mating with fertile females leads to a direct reduction in offspring. However, the need for sex separation entails significant technical and economic costs.

Experimental comparison of releases

Making the evaluation of bisexual releases highly relevant. A recent study experimentally compared, under controlled yet realistic conditions, the effectiveness of unisexual and bisexual releases in reducing the fertility of D. suzukii populations under controlled conditions.

The experiment was conducted in replicated cages using first-generation wild individuals emerging from infested cherries, along with a laboratory strain for the production of sterile insects, irradiated with X-rays at a dose capable of ensuring near-complete sterility.

Environmental and behavioral conditions were designed to closely mimic natural settings, including artificial vegetation, oviposition substrates, and realistic light–dark cycles.

Results and biological implications

The results showed that the proportion of fertile females producing offspring did not significantly differ between unisexual and bisexual treatments, reaching approximately 46% and 45% respectively, compared to a much higher value in the control (84%).

Even when considering only mated females, no differences between the two strategies were observed, indicating that the presence of sterile females does not interfere with the ability of sterile males to compete with wild males.

Similarly, female mating rates were not significantly affected by the type of release, suggesting that potentially negative behavioral phenomena do not play a major role under the tested conditions.

Applications and operational limits

From an applied perspective, these findings challenge a long-standing assumption in SIT programs, namely the necessity of sex separation prior to release. In the absence of negative effects on efficacy, eliminating this step could greatly simplify production processes.

Reducing costs and improving the scalability of the technique, particularly in confined systems such as greenhouses and tunnels. However, the researchers emphasize that extrapolation to open-field conditions should be approached with caution.

As more complex ecological factors, such as canopy structure, spatial distribution of insects, and microclimatic gradients, may influence mating dynamics.

Risk assessment and agronomic impact

Another important aspect concerns the potential risks associated with the presence of sterile females, particularly in terms of direct fruit damage risk. Available evidence suggests that sterilized females do not oviposit and do not cause significant damage.

Thereby reducing concerns about the agronomic acceptability of bisexual releases and supporting their practical implementation.

Conclusions and future outlook

In conclusion, the study provides strong evidence supporting the equivalence between unisexual and bisexual releases in SIT applied to Drosophila suzukii in pest management.

Indicating that sex separation may not be necessary, at least in confined production systems. This finding reinforces the potential of SIT as a sustainable tool for the protection of cherry orchards and fruit crops more broadly.

Source: Labbetoul, A., & Fellous, S. (2026). Bisexual releases are as effective as male‐only releases to control Drosophila suzukii with the sterile insect technique. Pest Management Science, 82: 4536-4543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70569 

Opening image source: Il Nord Est

Internal image source: Labbe Toul e Fellous, 2026

Andrea Giovannini
PhD in Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science and Technology - Arboriculture and Fruitculture, University of Bologna, IT


Cherry Times - All rights reserved

What to read next

Research identifies the significance of bee population rates in cherry orchards in Germany

Tech management

20 Dec 2023

Honey bees and mason bees promoted sweet cherry fruit set, but only when both were present. The results show that the provision of nesting material and the use of hives can increase the presence of bees in sweet cherry orchards.

The challenges of Italy’s sweet cherry season: a complex year amid rains and decreasing consumption

Production

02 Sep 2024

The sweet cherry supply for 2024 remained in line with the average of the last five seasons, which saw an average production of about 100,000 tons per year. However, 2023 stood out as a negative year, with a production of only 93,000 tons, the lowest value in the last five years.

In evidenza

Sweet cherry resilience to abiotic stresses: the role of HSP proteins

Breeding

21 Aug 2026

A genomic study identifies 17 HSP70 and HSP90 genes in sweet cherry and explains how they respond to heat and salinity. The results highlight key genes, including PavHSP90-5, that could support breeding of cultivars with resilience to climatic and environmental stress.

The nitrogen/phosphorus balance is crucial for the proper preservation of cherries

Post-harvest​

21 Aug 2026

A study in southern Chile shows how mineral nutrition, especially the balance between nitrogen and phosphorus, may influence internal browning in Regina sweet cherries, postharvest quality and the fruit’s ability to withstand long storage periods for export markets.

Tag Popolari