Sterile Insect Technique in Drosophila suzukii: bisexual releases do not compromise control efficacy

24 Apr 2026
621

The sustainable management of Drosophila suzukii, one of the most damaging pests in fruit crops, represents a major challenge, particularly in light of increasing restrictions on insecticide use.

In this context, the sterile insect technique (SIT) is emerging as a promising strategy within integrated pest management, based on the mass release of sterilized individuals to reduce the reproductive potential of natural populations.

Traditionally, SIT relies on the exclusive release of sterile males, as only their mating with fertile females leads to a direct reduction in offspring. However, the need for sex separation entails significant technical and economic costs.

Experimental comparison of releases

Making the evaluation of bisexual releases highly relevant. A recent study experimentally compared, under controlled yet realistic conditions, the effectiveness of unisexual and bisexual releases in reducing the fertility of D. suzukii populations under controlled conditions.

The experiment was conducted in replicated cages using first-generation wild individuals emerging from infested cherries, along with a laboratory strain for the production of sterile insects, irradiated with X-rays at a dose capable of ensuring near-complete sterility.

Environmental and behavioral conditions were designed to closely mimic natural settings, including artificial vegetation, oviposition substrates, and realistic light–dark cycles.

Results and biological implications

The results showed that the proportion of fertile females producing offspring did not significantly differ between unisexual and bisexual treatments, reaching approximately 46% and 45% respectively, compared to a much higher value in the control (84%).

Even when considering only mated females, no differences between the two strategies were observed, indicating that the presence of sterile females does not interfere with the ability of sterile males to compete with wild males.

Similarly, female mating rates were not significantly affected by the type of release, suggesting that potentially negative behavioral phenomena do not play a major role under the tested conditions.

Applications and operational limits

From an applied perspective, these findings challenge a long-standing assumption in SIT programs, namely the necessity of sex separation prior to release. In the absence of negative effects on efficacy, eliminating this step could greatly simplify production processes.

Reducing costs and improving the scalability of the technique, particularly in confined systems such as greenhouses and tunnels. However, the researchers emphasize that extrapolation to open-field conditions should be approached with caution.

As more complex ecological factors, such as canopy structure, spatial distribution of insects, and microclimatic gradients, may influence mating dynamics.

Risk assessment and agronomic impact

Another important aspect concerns the potential risks associated with the presence of sterile females, particularly in terms of direct fruit damage risk. Available evidence suggests that sterilized females do not oviposit and do not cause significant damage.

Thereby reducing concerns about the agronomic acceptability of bisexual releases and supporting their practical implementation.

Conclusions and future outlook

In conclusion, the study provides strong evidence supporting the equivalence between unisexual and bisexual releases in SIT applied to Drosophila suzukii in pest management.

Indicating that sex separation may not be necessary, at least in confined production systems. This finding reinforces the potential of SIT as a sustainable tool for the protection of cherry orchards and fruit crops more broadly.

Source: Labbetoul, A., & Fellous, S. (2026). Bisexual releases are as effective as male‐only releases to control Drosophila suzukii with the sterile insect technique. Pest Management Science, 82: 4536-4543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.70569 

Opening image source: Il Nord Est

Internal image source: Labbe Toul e Fellous, 2026

Andrea Giovannini
PhD in Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science and Technology - Arboriculture and Fruitculture, University of Bologna, IT


Cherry Times - All rights reserved

What to read next

Biodynamics through the eyes of an orchard: when the soil defies preconceptions

Tech management

25 May 2026

In Massimo Biondi’s biodynamic cherry orchard near Cesena, cover crops, microbiota and organic matter improve fertility, resilience and water management. Sweet varieties on Gisela 6 target yields between 80 and 100 quintals per hectare, showing living soil value in orchards.

Diversification and calendar expansion are driving global business development

Markets

15 Dec 2023

Rabobank senior analyst Gonzalo Salinas monitors global trends in the cherry trade as the Southern Hemisphere prepares for the 2023/24 season. At the end of 2023, there are mixed trends in the entire cherry sector.

In evidenza

Chilean cherries: what to do when the glamour fades

Production

13 Jul 2026

Chile’s cherry industry is facing a severe crisis driven by oversupply, falling prices and quality problems. Jordi Casas outlines a path forward: reduce planted area, diversify export markets, invest in genetics and improve orchard management to restore profitability.

Syrphid flies as effective pollinators of sweet cherry trees

Tech management

13 Jul 2026

Trials in Tasmania show that Eristalis tenax hoverflies, used alongside honeybees, can improve fruit set and sweet cherry yields. Active in cool and wet weather, these alternative pollinators could support more reliable orchards and reduce risks linked to varroa mite.

Tag Popolari